gavbon86: RT List price of a flagship, 96 core CPU with 1152MB of 元 cache: $14,756.RyanSmithAT: In performance? No idea at this time.gavbon86: RT Razer Updates The Blade 14 With Ryzen 9 7940HS, Up to RTX 4070 and 32 GB DDR5-5600.RyanSmithAT: Having seen all of them in person yesterday, Genoa-X doesn't immediately look any different from Genoa….RyanSmithAT: Not quite the same angle since I'm doing it by hand.gavbon86: RT Razer updates its Blade 14 laptop with AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Nvidia's RTX 4060 or RTX 4070, up to 32GB of RAM, and 14" QHD+ 240….gavbon86: RT Asus ROG Ally Is Now Available: A $700 Handheld Powerhouse.It has essentially outpriced itself from competing viably in the lower budget GPU market.
Lower power for the same performance at a similar enough price can be a tie-breaker between two competing options, but that's not the case here for the 1650. Someone might make that their primary purchasing decision for a power supply, because outside of being able to supply a given wattage for the system, the only thing that matters is its efficiency, and yes, over the long term higher efficiency PSUs are better built, last longer, and provide a justifiable hidden cost savings. In other words, people aren't saying "Man, my ForkNight performance is good, but my power bills are too high! In order to remedy the exorbitant cost of my power bill, I'm going to go out and purchase a $150 GPU (which is more than 1 month of my power bill alone), even if it offers the same performance of my current GPU, just to save money on my power bill!" JoeyJoJo123 - Friday, link Nobody in their right mind that's specifically on the market for an aftermarket GPU (a buying decision that comes about BECAUSE they're dissatisfied with the current framerate or performance of their existing, or lack of, a GPU) is making their primary purchasing decision on power savings alone.If anything, it looks to be the result of preferring cooling over acoustics, given the very low load temperatures. The GTX 1650's fan isn't the worst, but it's not a standout best either. While the GTX 1650 may have good power and temperature characteristics, the noise is not as clean, if only because entry-level cards don't come with 0db fan idling technology, and SFF cards often have to deal with small shrill fans at relatively high RPM. Temperatures all appear fairly normal, as the GTX 1650 stays very cool under load. Though the greater cooling requirements for a higher power card does means forgoing the small form factor. Better – but not always – performance can be had for an additional ~75W at the wall, which maps well to the 150W TBP of the RX 570 over the 75W slot-power-only GTX 1650.
GTX TEMPERATURE MONITOR FULL
Meanwhile at full load, the power consumption disparity between the RX 570 and GTX 1650 is one of the key factors in a direct comparison. With contemporary desktop cards, idle power has reached the point where nothing short of low-level testing can expose what these cards are drawing. GeForce Video Card Average ClockspeedsĪs for idle power consumption, the GTX 1650 falls in line with everything else, with total system power consumption reaching 83W. As always, we'll take a look at power, temperature, and noise of the GTX 1650, though the 'mini' design shouldn't hold any surprises.
0 kommentar(er)
